CLAT Practice Set 1
CLAT UG · 2026 · with answers and explanations
- questions
- 30
- Total marks
- 30
- Duration
- 120 minutes
- Negative marking
- −0.25
Subjects: English · General Knowledge · Legal Studies · Aptitude (Reasoning) · Mathematics
Question 1
English · 1 marks · −0.25Read the passage: 'The Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Part III of the Constitution. The Court observed that privacy includes the preservation of personal intimacies, the sanctity of family life, marriage, procreation, the home, and sexual orientation.' This landmark judgment was delivered in which case?
- A.Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
- B.Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
- C.Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
- D.Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The passage describes the ruling in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017), where a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court unanimously declared that the right to privacy is a fundamental right protected under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Question 2
English · 1 marks · −0.25Choose the word most opposite in meaning to 'acquittal':
- A.Conviction
- B.Bail
- C.Pardon
- D.Adjournment
Correct answer: A
Explanation: 'Acquittal' means a judgment that a person is not guilty of a crime. Its antonym is 'conviction', which is a formal declaration that someone is guilty. 'Bail' is temporary release, 'pardon' is forgiveness of a crime after conviction, and 'adjournment' is a postponement.
Question 3
English · 1 marks · −0.25Identify the sentence with the correct use of grammar:
- A.The lawyer who I met yesterday was very experienced.
- B.If I were the judge, I would have delivered a different verdict.
- C.The witness was nervous, he could not answer the questions.
- D.Less people attended the hearing than expected.
Correct answer: B
Explanation: Option B is correct. 'Were' is the correct subjunctive form after 'If I were' (expressing a hypothetical/contrary-to-fact condition). Option A should use 'whom' (object of 'met'). Option C has a comma splice. Option D misuses 'less' with a countable noun ('people'); it should be 'fewer'.
Question 4
English · 1 marks · −0.25Read the passage: 'The pen is mightier than the sword. This expression, coined by Edward Bulwer-Lytton in 1839, suggests that written words and intellectual ideas have more influence than direct violence or military force.' Based on this passage, the main argument is that:
- A.Military force is always unnecessary
- B.Written communication and ideas are more powerful than violence
- C.Pens are better tools than swords
- D.Edward Bulwer-Lytton was a pacifist
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The passage clearly states that the expression suggests that written communication and ideas (the pen) have more influence and power than violence or military force (the sword). It is about the supremacy of intellectual persuasion over physical force.
Question 5
English · 1 marks · −0.25Arrange the following sentences to form a coherent paragraph: (i) Courts play a vital role in interpreting these rights. (ii) Fundamental Rights are guaranteed by the Constitution. (iii) They can be enforced through writs issued by the Supreme Court and High Courts. (iv) These rights protect citizens against arbitrary state action.
- A.ii, iv, i, iii
- B.iv, ii, iii, i
- C.i, iii, ii, iv
- D.ii, i, iv, iii
Correct answer: A
Explanation: The logical order begins with the introduction of Fundamental Rights (ii), their purpose of protecting citizens (iv), the role of courts in interpreting them (i), and finally the enforcement mechanism through writs (iii).
Question 6
General Knowledge · 1 marks · −0.25Which Article of the Indian Constitution abolishes untouchability in all its forms?
- A.Article 14
- B.Article 15
- C.Article 17
- D.Article 21
Correct answer: C
Explanation: Article 17 of the Indian Constitution abolishes untouchability and forbids its practice in any form. The enforcement of any disability arising from untouchability is a punishable offence. The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 provides penalties for the practice.
Question 7
General Knowledge · 1 marks · −0.25The Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India was introduced through which Constitutional Amendment?
- A.86th Amendment
- B.91st Amendment
- C.101st Amendment
- D.99th Amendment
Correct answer: C
Explanation: GST was introduced in India through the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016, and came into effect on 1 July 2017. It subsumed multiple indirect taxes (excise, VAT, service tax, etc.) into a unified national tax system.
Question 8
General Knowledge · 1 marks · −0.25ISRO's Chandrayaan-3 mission, which successfully landed on the Moon's south pole in August 2023, made India the _____ country to achieve a soft landing on the Moon.
- A.Second
- B.Third
- C.Fourth
- D.Fifth
Correct answer: C
Explanation: India became the fourth country to achieve a soft landing on the Moon (after the Soviet Union, the United States, and China). It was also the first country to successfully land near the lunar south pole.
Question 9
General Knowledge · 1 marks · −0.25The Paris Agreement on climate change, adopted in 2015, aims to limit global temperature increase to well below ____ degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
- A.1.0 degrees Celsius
- B.1.5 degrees Celsius
- C.2.0 degrees Celsius
- D.3.0 degrees Celsius
Correct answer: C
Explanation: The Paris Agreement aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, with efforts to limit it to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. It was adopted by 196 parties at COP21 in Paris in December 2015 and entered into force on 4 November 2016.
Question 10
General Knowledge · 1 marks · −0.25The Khelo India programme, launched by the Government of India, primarily aims to:
- A.Build luxury stadiums in metropolitan cities
- B.Promote grassroots sports and nurture young talent
- C.Organise only cricket tournaments
- D.Train athletes exclusively for the Olympics
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The Khelo India programme, launched in 2018, aims to promote sports culture at the grassroots level in India by identifying and nurturing young sporting talent. It includes the Khelo India Youth Games, University Games, and Winter Games, and provides annual scholarships and training support to talented athletes.
Question 11
General Knowledge · 1 marks · −0.25The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) were established at which conference?
- A.Yalta Conference
- B.Bretton Woods Conference
- C.Versailles Conference
- D.Bandung Conference
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The World Bank (originally the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development) and the IMF were both established at the Bretton Woods Conference held in New Hampshire, USA, in July 1944. They are often referred to as the Bretton Woods institutions.
Question 12
Legal Studies · 1 marks · −0.25Principle: Every person has a right to defend their body and property against criminal harm. However, the right of private defence does not extend to inflicting more harm than necessary. Facts: A saw B climbing over the wall of A's house at 2 AM. A picked up a gun and shot B, causing his death. B was later found to be an unarmed teenage neighbour who had come to retrieve a ball. Which of the following is most likely correct?
- A.A was fully justified in shooting B
- B.A exceeded the right of private defence by using disproportionate force
- C.B committed a criminal offence so A's action was legal
- D.A had no right to take any action
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The right of private defence allows proportional force. While A had reason to apprehend danger from an intruder at night, shooting and killing an unarmed person was disproportionate (more harm than necessary). A could have used non-lethal force or raised an alarm. A exceeded the right of private defence.
Question 13
Legal Studies · 1 marks · −0.25Principle: A valid contract requires an offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to create legal relations. An agreement without consideration is void. Facts: X promises Y that X will give Y a car as a birthday gift. X later refuses. Can Y enforce this promise?
- A.Yes, because X made a clear promise
- B.No, because the promise lacks consideration from Y
- C.Yes, because birthday gifts are legally binding
- D.No, because oral promises are never valid
Correct answer: B
Explanation: A gift promise lacks consideration — Y has not given or promised anything in return. Under contract law, an agreement without consideration is void (Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, with limited exceptions). Since this is a bare promise without consideration, Y cannot enforce it as a contract.
Question 14
Legal Studies · 1 marks · −0.25Under the Indian Constitution, which type of writ can be issued by a court to compel a public authority to perform a mandatory duty that it has failed to perform?
- A.Habeas Corpus
- B.Mandamus
- C.Certiorari
- D.Quo Warranto
Correct answer: B
Explanation: A writ of mandamus (literally 'we command') is issued by a court to compel a government officer, body, or lower court to perform a mandatory duty they have failed to carry out. It cannot be issued against a private individual or for discretionary duties.
Question 15
Legal Studies · 1 marks · −0.25The legal maxim 'Res Judicata' means:
- A.Let the master answer
- B.A matter already judged — cannot be relitigated
- C.Innocent until proven guilty
- D.No one can be a judge in their own cause
Correct answer: B
Explanation: 'Res Judicata' means 'a matter already judged'. It prevents the same matter from being litigated again between the same parties. Once a competent court has delivered a final judgment on the merits of a case, the same issue cannot be raised in another suit.
Question 16
Legal Studies · 1 marks · −0.25Principle: Negligence is the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in a similar situation. The burden of proof lies on the plaintiff. Facts: M slipped and fell on a wet floor in a shopping mall. There was no 'wet floor' warning sign. M suffered a fractured arm. M sues the mall for negligence. Which is most likely?
- A.M will not succeed because accidents happen in public places
- B.M will likely succeed because the mall breached its duty of care by not placing a warning sign
- C.M will not succeed because M should have been more careful
- D.M will succeed only if the floor was intentionally made wet
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The mall owed a duty of care to its visitors (business invitees). A reasonably prudent establishment would place warning signs on wet floors. The failure to place a sign constitutes a breach of the standard of care. M's injury was a foreseeable consequence of this breach. M would likely succeed in a negligence claim.
Question 17
Legal Studies · 1 marks · −0.25Principle: A person is said to have committed trespass when they enter or remain on another's property without permission. Facts: P enters Q's farmland, believing it to be an abandoned public space, to take a shortcut to the market. Q sees P and asks P to leave. P refuses and continues walking. Which statement is correct?
- A.P committed trespass from the very beginning
- B.P committed trespass from the moment P refused to leave after Q's request
- C.P did not commit trespass because P believed it was public land
- D.P did not commit trespass because P was merely taking a shortcut
Correct answer: B
Explanation: Even though P initially entered under a mistaken belief, once Q (the owner) asked P to leave and P refused, P's continued presence became unauthorised entry — constituting trespass. The initial mistake does not excuse the refusal to leave after being asked by the rightful owner.
Question 18
Legal Studies · 1 marks · −0.25Principle: Under Hindu law, both sons and daughters have equal rights in ancestral property by birth. Facts: R died intestate (without a will). R had two sons and one daughter. R owned ancestral property worth Rs 30 lakhs. What is the daughter's share?
- A.Nothing, as only sons inherit ancestral property
- B.Rs 5 lakhs
- C.Rs 10 lakhs
- D.Rs 15 lakhs
Correct answer: C
Explanation: After the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, daughters have equal coparcenary rights in ancestral property. With two sons and one daughter, R's property would be divided equally among the three children. Each would receive Rs 30 lakhs / 3 = Rs 10 lakhs.
Question 19
Legal Studies · 1 marks · −0.25Principle: Rules must be applied to fact situations to determine legal outcomes. Rule: No person shall park a vehicle in a no-parking zone. A fine of Rs 500 shall be imposed for each violation. Facts: S parked her car in a no-parking zone for 30 minutes while she went to a hospital emergency. She claims it was an emergency. What is the legal outcome?
- A.S is exempt because of the medical emergency
- B.S is liable for the Rs 500 fine as the rule makes no exception for emergencies
- C.S should pay double the fine for using emergency as an excuse
- D.The rule does not apply because it was only 30 minutes
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The rule states 'No person shall park' and prescribes a fixed fine. The rule makes no exception for emergencies. While S's reason is sympathetic, applying the rule strictly to the facts: S parked in a no-parking zone and is liable for the Rs 500 fine. Courts may show leniency, but strictly applying the rule leads to the fine.
Question 20
Aptitude (Reasoning) · 1 marks · −0.25Statements: Some lawyers are judges. All judges are honest. Conclusions: I. Some lawyers are honest. II. All honest people are judges. Which conclusion(s) follow?
- A.Only Conclusion I follows
- B.Only Conclusion II follows
- C.Both follow
- D.Neither follows
Correct answer: A
Explanation: From 'Some lawyers are judges' and 'All judges are honest': Since some lawyers are judges and all judges are honest, those lawyers who are judges must be honest. So Conclusion I (some lawyers are honest) follows. Conclusion II (all honest people are judges) does not follow — honest is a larger set that may include non-judges.
Question 21
Aptitude (Reasoning) · 1 marks · −0.25In a row of people, A is 12th from the left and B is 10th from the right. If there are 3 people between A and B, what is the minimum number of people in the row?
- A.22
- B.25
- C.17
- D.20
Correct answer: C
Explanation: A is at position 12 from the left. B is at position 10 from the right. With 3 people between them, B could be at position 16 from the left (12 + 3 + 1 = 16). Total people = 16 + 10 - 1 = 25. Alternatively, B could be at position 8 from the left (12 - 3 - 1 = 8), giving total = 8 + 10 - 1 = 17. The minimum is 17.
Question 22
Aptitude (Reasoning) · 1 marks · −0.25Statement: 'The new policy will reduce unemployment.' Assumption: I. There is currently unemployment. II. The new policy can generate jobs. Which assumption(s) are implicit?
- A.Only Assumption I
- B.Only Assumption II
- C.Both Assumptions I and II
- D.Neither assumption
Correct answer: C
Explanation: For the statement to make sense, both assumptions must be implicit. The policy can only 'reduce' unemployment if unemployment currently exists (Assumption I). Also, 'will reduce unemployment' implies the policy has the capability to generate or facilitate jobs (Assumption II). Both are necessary for the statement to hold.
Question 23
Aptitude (Reasoning) · 1 marks · −0.25Which of the following arguments, if true, would most WEAKEN the claim: 'Strict gun control laws will reduce crime rates'?
- A.Countries with strict gun laws have lower gun violence
- B.Most gun violence is committed with illegally obtained firearms regardless of existing laws
- C.Gun control reduces the number of accidental shootings
- D.Public opinion strongly favours stricter gun control
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The argument that criminals obtain guns through illegal channels regardless of laws directly weakens the claim by suggesting that strict laws would primarily affect law-abiding citizens while criminals would still have access to firearms, thus not reducing crime rates.
Question 24
Mathematics · 1 marks · −0.25If the ratio of the cost price of two articles A and B is 3:5 and the selling prices are in the ratio 5:7, and article A is sold at 25% profit, what is the profit or loss percentage on article B?
- A.5% profit
- B.10% profit
- C.5% loss
- D.12% profit
Correct answer: A
Explanation: Let CP of A = 3k and CP of B = 5k. A is sold at 25% profit, so SP of A = 3k x 1.25 = 3.75k. SP ratio is 5:7, so SP of B = 3.75k x 7/5 = 5.25k. Profit on B = 5.25k - 5k = 0.25k. Profit % on B = (0.25k/5k) x 100 = 5%.
Question 25
Mathematics · 1 marks · −0.25The average of five numbers is 42. If one number is removed, the average becomes 38. What is the removed number?
- A.48
- B.52
- C.58
- D.62
Correct answer: C
Explanation: Sum of 5 numbers = 42 x 5 = 210. Sum of remaining 4 numbers = 38 x 4 = 152. The removed number = 210 - 152 = 58.
Question 26
Mathematics · 1 marks · −0.25A car travels the first 120 km at 60 km/h and the next 180 km at 90 km/h. What is the average speed for the entire journey?
- A.70 km/h
- B.75 km/h
- C.80 km/h
- D.72 km/h
Correct answer: B
Explanation: Time for first part = 120/60 = 2 hours. Time for second part = 180/90 = 2 hours. Total distance = 300 km. Total time = 4 hours. Average speed = 300/4 = 75 km/h.
Question 27
Mathematics · 1 marks · −0.25If 3x + 7 = 22, what is the value of 5x - 3?
- A.18
- B.22
- C.20
- D.25
Correct answer: B
Explanation: 3x + 7 = 22. So 3x = 15 and x = 5. Therefore, 5x - 3 = 5(5) - 3 = 25 - 3 = 22.
Question 28
Mathematics · 1 marks · −0.25A table shows the number of criminal cases filed in four districts in 2023: District P = 450, Q = 380, R = 520, S = 650. What percentage of total cases were filed in District R?
- A.22%
- B.26%
- C.28%
- D.24%
Correct answer: B
Explanation: Total cases = 450 + 380 + 520 + 650 = 2000. Percentage for R = (520/2000) x 100 = 26%.
Question 29
English · 1 marks · −0.25Read the passage: 'In the celebrated case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the United States Supreme Court declared that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, overturning the earlier separate but equal doctrine.' Which earlier doctrine was overturned?
- A.Due process doctrine
- B.Separate but equal doctrine
- C.Eminent domain doctrine
- D.Double jeopardy doctrine
Correct answer: B
Explanation: The passage directly states that Brown v. Board of Education overturned the 'separate but equal' doctrine, which had been established by Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). That doctrine had allowed racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were ostensibly equal.
Question 30
Aptitude (Reasoning) · 1 marks · −0.25Find the odd one out: Judge, Lawyer, Plaintiff, Stethoscope, Defendant
- A.Judge
- B.Plaintiff
- C.Stethoscope
- D.Defendant
Correct answer: C
Explanation: Judge, Lawyer, Plaintiff, and Defendant are all terms related to a court of law. A stethoscope is a medical instrument and does not belong to this group.